Uncategorized

Prompt Engineering vs Loop Engineering vs Graph Engineering: What Changes at Each Layer

Three terms now compete for the same line in AI engineering job descriptions. Prompt engineering is the established one. Loop engineering entered the AI vocabulary in late 2025 and dominated developer discussion through June 2026. Graph engineering followed roughly six weeks later. They get used interchangeably. Should they be? The three are not competing techniques. […]

Prompt Engineering vs Loop Engineering vs Graph Engineering: What Changes at Each Layer Read More »

What the CMS HCC transition means for the future of open analytics

Open-source technologies have become a standard part of modern analytics, data science and AI. Organizations across regulated industries are adopting tools like Python to accelerate innovation while building more flexible analytics environments. But adopting open-source technologies introduces a new challenge. As organizations modernize, they must also maintain the governance, transparency […] The post What the

What the CMS HCC transition means for the future of open analytics Read More »

4 lessons on turning AI into real business decisions

Organizations have spent the past few years experimenting with AI. The question now isn’t whether AI can generate insights. It’s whether organizations can consistently turn those insights into business decisions that create measurable value. That’s where many AI initiatives stall. Models perform well in development but never make it to […] The post 4 lessons

4 lessons on turning AI into real business decisions Read More »

Prompt Engineering vs Loop Engineering vs Graph Engineering: What Changes at Each Layer

Three terms now compete for the same line in AI engineering job descriptions. Prompt engineering is the established one. Loop engineering entered the AI vocabulary in late 2025 and dominated developer discussion through June 2026. Graph engineering followed roughly six weeks later. They get used interchangeably. Should they be? The three are not competing techniques.

Prompt Engineering vs Loop Engineering vs Graph Engineering: What Changes at Each Layer Read More »

A Practical Guide to Bone Tissue Labeling and Annotation

Bone tissue labeling is not merely about learning and memorizing anatomical terms. It is about exploration of the dynamic, self-renewing tissue. In both clinical and academic settings, confusion between macroscopic layers and microscopic systems can lead to errors in clinical application and identification. A single orthopedic CT scan may contain hundreds of slices, while a

A Practical Guide to Bone Tissue Labeling and Annotation Read More »

Induction Labs Photon-1 Simulates Desktops, Plays Checkers, and Models Billiard Physics From One Pretraining Run

Most agents that learn from video need to know what action produced each frame. Induction Labs is arguing that this requirement is the bottleneck. Last week, they released imagination models, a foundation model architecture that pretrains on raw video with no action labels at all. Their test system is Photon-1, a sparse 106B-A5B mixture-of-experts (MoE)

Induction Labs Photon-1 Simulates Desktops, Plays Checkers, and Models Billiard Physics From One Pretraining Run Read More »

How to build predictive health care AI from data to decision

Explore how SAS Health and SAS Viya help healthcare organizations transform clinical and operational data into predictive, AI-driven decisioning workflows that improve patient outcomes through risk identification, model deployment, and governed agentic AI. The post How to build predictive health care AI from data to decision appeared first on SAS Blogs.

How to build predictive health care AI from data to decision Read More »

Poolside releases Laguna S 2.1, a 118B open-weight coding model that matches rivals many times its size

Poolside has released Laguna S 2.1, a 118B-parameter open-weight model built for agentic coding. It is a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model with 8B activated parameters per token. It supports a context window of up to 1M tokens in both thinking and no-thinking modes. The weights are on Hugging Face under an OpenMDW-1.1 license, and the model

Poolside releases Laguna S 2.1, a 118B open-weight coding model that matches rivals many times its size Read More »

Poolside Releases Laguna S 2.1, an Open-Weight Agentic Coding Model Punching Above Its Weight Class on SWE-Bench Multilingual

Poolside has released Laguna S 2.1, a 118B-parameter open-weight model built for agentic coding. It is a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model with 8B activated parameters per token. It supports a context window of up to 1M tokens in both thinking and no-thinking modes. The weights are on Hugging Face under an OpenMDW-1.1 license, and the model

Poolside Releases Laguna S 2.1, an Open-Weight Agentic Coding Model Punching Above Its Weight Class on SWE-Bench Multilingual Read More »

Google Releases Gemini 3.6 Flash, 3.5 Flash-Lite, and 3.5 Flash Cyber: A Cheaper, More Token-Efficient Flash Tier Built for Agentic Workloads

Developers building production agents need higher token efficiency, lower latency, and more reliable performance. Today, Google has released three new Gemini models. The lineup is Gemini 3.6 Flash, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite, and Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber. All three sit in the Flash tier, which Google tunes for speed, cost, and high-volume agentic work rather than

Google Releases Gemini 3.6 Flash, 3.5 Flash-Lite, and 3.5 Flash Cyber: A Cheaper, More Token-Efficient Flash Tier Built for Agentic Workloads Read More »